OBAMA: FALSE HOPE, FALSE MESSIAH

Voter Fraud 2012...Too Late to Protest

It's been my contention that the 2012 presidential election was a scam! Barack Obama had such a losing record that I couldn't see how Mitt Romney lost. One factor was the liberal press giving the mixed race president enough support to keep his personals untouched...

The linked article says what I believe about the 20112 election and maybe you feel the same way. Here's an excerpt:

"So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states. According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio's Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio's 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.

The inflated numbers can't just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by."

Read more at...
A fraudulant president...

PM Netanyahu Meets Holocaust Survivor

Why We Remember The Holocaust

PM Netanyahu at annual Holocaust Memorial Day Ceremony

Email from L. Brent Bozell III MRC

Despite the scandals that seem to dog her wherever she goes, Hillary Clinton remains a de facto presidential nominee. Benghazi . . . secret government emails . . . dubious Clinton Foundation donations . . . all these have surfaced in the news but seem to conveniently go away. (This list is not even remotely comprehensive.)

One can't help but ask, how did a woman with such a staggering number of personal, political, and financial scandals become a major party front-runner?


The answer is simple: Hillary Clinton is a liberal, and in typical fashion, her cohorts in the liberal media have inoculated her from real scrutiny:

• CNN anchor Jake Tapper helped deflect criticism of Clinton when he strangely suggested that Benghazi always seemed like more of a White House scandal than a State Department scandal.
• In fact, after Hillary's ridiculous "what difference does it make" defense before Congress, scooped up by media lapdogs as some kind of "riveting" triumph, the liberal media never held her to account for the death of Ambassador Stevens or the three other Americans.
• In less than two weeks after Clinton's email scandal broke, the evening news networks dropped the story altogether, failing to even mention the possible criminal charges Clinton could face for her improper record-keeping.

We cannot stand by and let this journalistic dereliction continue—action must be taken, and you can help today. And thanks to friends of the Media Research Center, any amount that we raise up to $200,000 will be DOUBLED!

Compare this coverage to the treatment the liberal media gave potential Republican presidential contender Chris Christie. In less than 48 hours, ABC, CBS, and NBC deluged viewers with coverage of Chris Christie's traffic jam scandal, devoting a staggering 88 minutes to the story.

The same reporters who insist that Chris Christie's presidential aspirations are ruined by bridge traffic jams are letting Hillary Clinton off the hook for embassy-security neglect that led to four dead government employees in Benghazi. It's an astounding double standard that must be exposed and stopped!

The MRC is working around the clock to ensure that the liberal media are called out for their hypocrisy. Your support allows us to expose the liberal media's bias and ensure that the American public understands the truth, particularly about Hillary Clinton.

We must raise $50,000 by midnight on April 17 so that we can get a jump on exposing and countering the leftist media's favoritism.

This is a massive undertaking, but for the sake of our nation's future, it's critical.

I'm counting on you to help us expose, counter, and neutralize the liberal media and their influence in the upcoming election season.

Help us meet our $50,000 goal. Give to the MRC today!

Sincerely,
L. Brent Bozell III
Founder and President
Media Research Center

Margaret Sanger views on sin, marriage, and planned parenthood