American Insight: November 2016

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Welcome Aboard Trump Flight 1600

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Friday, November 25, 2016

Most readers know that personalities like Chuck Norris, Clint Eastwood, and Dennis Miller supported President-elect Donald Trump. These individuals, like many of their cohorts, suffered the scorn of Hollywood and the sports world for expressing their dedication to Conservative values. Here is a partial list of other winners who bet the house on Trump:

Scott Baio

Kirk Cameron

Stephen Baldwin

Gary Busey

James Caan

Dean Cain

Lou Ferrigno

Jerry Lewis

Rich Little

Michael Moriarty

Jim Norton

Joe Piscopo

Tim Allen

John Ratzenberger

Antonio Sabàto Jr.

Kevin Sorbo

Jean-Claude Van Damme

Jon Voight

Fred Williamson

Pat Boone

Larry Gatlin

Loretta Lynn

Wayne Newton

Ted Nugent

Red Steagall

Kanye West

Don King

Johnny Bench

Curt Schilling

Tom Brady

Terrell Owens

Tim Tebow

Rosey Greir

Hershel Walker

Jack Nicklaus

Lou Holtz

Some of these folks may sound familiar, others may not be known to the public. Voters may or may not have cared about their endorsements. The individuals above, with others, fought the intolerant liberal world to openly communicate conservative principles. The majority of voters gave their vote to Donald Trump, the President who will bring our country out of the disaster of Barack Obama years!

What are Newspapers Good For?

The 2016 general election year will go down in history as the Year of the Newspaper Dump! What do I mean by this? It is interesting how many major and minor daily newspapers in our country endorsed Hillary Clinton. The list stands at about 243 including our local San Antonio Express-News.

Most of the papers backing Clinton have normally leaned to liberal side of politics. These include of course the New York Times and the Washington Post. This year a few conservative types such as The Arizona Republic, The Dallas Morning News, and The Cincinnati Enquirer threw their weight behind Clinton.

In my opinion, the reason behind their decisions probably had to do with an outsider (Donald Trump) running against a lifetime politician (Hillary Clinton). We saw a business executive pushing for change in Washington D.C. and our country versus a political hound dog expressing business as usual for all.

Only 20 daily newspapers came out with a direct endorsement of Donald Trump. Some lesser-known newspapers such as the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the New York Observer gave Trump their OK. Maybe Vegas knew better! Maybe having a man like Trump running our nation made more sense than a career politician did.

With hindsight, we know that endorsements mean very little to the voting public. The Silent Majority kept up with politics using the Internet. We read for ourselves about all the corruption found in one candidate’s camp. We saw hostility shown Donald Trump by the intolerant Left. We witnessed the campaign that the newspapers did NOT report. In the end, Hillary was the predicted candidate of most newspapers!

Hollywood Liberal Losers

Most readers know that such Hollywood types as Whoopi Goldberg, Cher, Rosie O'Donnell, and others endorsed Hillary Clinton. Here is a partial list of other losers who put their money on Hillary:

Paula Abdul
Adele
Christina Aguilera
Marc Anthony
Burt Bacharach
Harry Belafonte
Tony Bennett
Beyoncé
Jon Bon Jovi
Boy George
Jimmy Buffett
Mariah Carey
Rosanne Cash
Sheryl Crow
Miley Cyrus
Melissa Etheridge
Don Everly
Vicente Fernández
Faith Hill
Janet Jackson
Elton John
Gladys Knight
Lady Gaga
k.d. lang
Cyndi Lauper
Jennifer Lopez
Madonna
Ricky Martin
Paul McCartney
Tim McGraw
Bette Midler
Katy Perry
Lionel Richie
Carly Simon
Nancy Sinatra
Bruce Springsteen
Sting
Barbra Streisand
Justin Timberlake
Stevie Wonder

Some of these “personalities” may sound familiar, others are has been or unknown to the public. I don't know if some of these people are leaving our country as the three mentioned at the beginning, but I guess none will be missed.

Voters really do not care what star or singer endorses a particular candidate. The majority of voters gave their pledge to the person who is most likely to bring our country out of the misery of Barack Obama’s eight-year reign!

Muslim migrants RIOT in Bulgaria’s largest refugee center

CONQUEST BY RIOT
Muslim migrants RIOT in Bulgaria’s largest refugee center

MONK BLOODBATH: Masked gunman SLITS THROAT of nun and kills man at Montpellier religious home

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

A Thanksgiving Message from President-Elect Donald J. Trump

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Ingraham Decimates Juan Williams on Trump 'Team of Radicals' Charge

INGRAHAM IGNITED!!

Monday, November 21, 2016

ABC and Co. Continue to Pick on Trump

I am watching the local noon news “show” in San Antonio TX. This particular television station is an ABC affiliate. The newscasters sitting at the desk, like their parent network talking heads, treat any news regarding President-elect Donald Trump pessimistically.

This time around, the news “commentary” was about Mr. Trump’s discussions with potential cabinet members and his team. The schlock network has problems with anything he does or who he picks. ABC like other networks just cannot accept our new President.

ABC was and is a Hillary Clinton backer. From start to finish, ABC and other networks had Hillary winning the 2016 election. The mainstream media also treats Barack Obama like some kind of savior, which he is NOT. All Left-Wing networks better remember that the Silent Majority elected Donald Trump…not Hillary and not St. Barack!

The night before, ABC presented an awards show that had some two-bit performers preach to THEIR new President. It looks like too many crybaby Hollywood types just cannot get over the fact that we the People won this election. We picked the right person to lead us back from the brink on the liberal cliff. Yes, these vaudeville rejects have a right to speak out, but get off the American stage and find you a soapbox in Central Park to sermonize!

SCHLOCK Green Day - "No Trump! No KKK! No Fascist USA!" Chant at AMAs

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Liberal Media Just Can’t Get Over a Trump Win

The insanity continues! Liberal newspapers just don’t get it.

Here in San Antonio TX, we have a weekly community paper sponsored by the Hearst Corporation’s San Antonio Express-News. I hate to give this newspaper so much publicity, but they leave themselves open as cry baby liberals who cannot fathom that America voted for and elected Donald Trump. Most of the opinions in both the mother paper and its offspring, disguised as writing, lean to the Left.

The community paper, that will remain nameless, has a writer (opinion hack) whose headline on page five reads “Maybe Trump Never Learned About Politeness.” The writer uses the feature name Comadre Chronicles. Maybe she should change it to the COMRADE CHRONICLES!

The first line reads, “How many parents are asking themselves, am I going to explain to my kids that it is not OK to act like President-elect Donald Trump?” I guess the writer knows President-elect Trump personally and can offer such a one-liner! Maybe the writer has inside information on how Trump acts every second, every minute, every hour, every day, ad infinitum. It could be that this writer has a degree from Miss Etiquette University on how we should all act. Who knows?

Don’t let her first line fool you; she’s not done yet! Next, she targets Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and them Ronald Reagan. She talks about role models; hinting that these Presidents were not. She needs to protect her poor pampered kids from acting like these mean men.

I wonder if she wants to sponsor Bill Clinton for sainthood. Maybe his many affairs are just “boys being boys.” Ask Monica! I wonder if Hillary’s lying is nothing to write about and we should ignore it along with Benghazi! Maybe her kids should act more like Hillary and throw after-election tantrums.

Gosh, what makes me feel that this “Comadre” writer leans way to Left of Center? Why do I feel offended by her rants? Could it be that she and other Clinton cheerleaders are still crying in their beer?

She ends the “opinion” piece with the line “It may be one of the biggest lessons a kid can learn that only a parent can teach.” I recommend that the writer grow up before she can teach her kids how to grow up!

Let’s see…Donald Trump won the presidential election…people who don’t like the results should all stop acting like spoiled brats…I didn’t riot or cry when Barack Obama won his seat!

Why Are Company Bosses Afraid of Donald Trump?

Almost everyone who has perused the Internet knows that the CEO of PepsiCo Indra Nooyi has bad-mouthed President-elect Donald Trump. She has an imaginary fear of Trump. Her fears may come from a lack of analysis or her left leaning views. Who knows? However, she is not alone. Other company CEOs and founders share her questionable beliefs. Listed below are a few of her associates and reasons why they feel annoyed by Trump:

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos

Donald Trump once said, "Amazon is getting away with murder, tax-wise. He's using the Washington Post for power so that the politicians in Washington don't tax Amazon like they should be taxed.”

Ford CEO Mark Fields

Concerning Ford’s move to build a factory in Mexico, Trump said, "What does that do? We don't get anything. Does Mexico come here and build factories here? We lose a fortune with every deal."

Apple CEO Tim Cook

Trump warned Cook, "We're going to get Apple to build their damn computers and things in this country instead of other countries."

Lockheed Martin CEO Marillyn Hewson

Regarding the defense contractor's F-35 fighter jet contract, Trump said "When they say that this (F-35) cannot perform as well as the planes we already have, what are [we] doing, and spending so much more money?"

New York Times Chairman and Publisher Arthur Sulzberger

Trump has promised he would consider allowing libel laws against the media so that he and other people who felt they were unjustifiably persecuted by the press could sue news organizations. Trump said, "So when The New York Times writes a hit piece which is a total disgrace or when The Washington Post, which is there for other reasons, writes a hit piece, we can sue them and win money instead of having no chance of winning because they're totally protected.”

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Who is George Soros and What is His Relationship with Hillary Clinton

Billionaire George Soros donated large amounts of money to elect and re-elect Barack Obama. Soros also funds an endless list of left-wing causes to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Soros is on a crusade to destroy Fox News, conservative talk radio, and any media that dare to tell the truth! It's time to stop this old Leftist Socialist. Check out the Media Research Center to help.

For those of you who DO NOT know who George Soros is, here’s a short biography of this evil man:

George Soros is a Hungarian born Jew. Soros was born in 1930 as Schwartz György. This Hungarian-American business mogul, investor, and Left-leaning philanthropist made his money in the U.S. and Great Britain.

As a teenager, he help the Nazis identify Jewish citizens for deportation. Posing as a Christian, Soros comfortably survived throughout the Second World War.

Soros was educated in England and later moved to the U.S. in the 1950s. In New York, he found like minds that leaned toward the Left. He also made money investing in companies through questionable tactics. With his fortunes, he now funds Left Wing programs, societies, and policies.

In 2016, George Soros invested heavily in the campaign to elect Hillary Clinton. George Soros and Hillary Clinton had gone to great lengths to hide their association until 2004. Hillary supports many causes Soros has fought for such as rationing healthcare, rolling back gun rights, and extending the voting franchise to convicted felons. Refer to the book “The Shadow Party” written by David Horowitz and Richard Poe for more information regarding the Soros-Clinton cartel.

Monday, November 14, 2016

The Week Magazine is a Weak Ragazine

According to the cover of The Week Magazine, I was expected to be doing this when Donald Trump lost the presidential election. I don’t even remember doing this when Barack Obama, some unknown politician, won the 2008 election. The same holds true for Obama’s 2012 election. I often wonder whey both Republican candidates during those two election cycles lost.

Neither candidate, now forgotten by history, made an issue of the mysterious Barack Obama. Later, nothing was said about the way government was leaning towards a socialist ilk under Obama. No one wanted to criticize Obama because he was black. The truth is…Obama is of mixed race…so why pamper the guy? Oh, that’s right; ask the Main Stream Media…his cheerleaders!

I am an Independent voter. I am sorry to say that I voted for Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat many years ago. Later in life, I found out how much of a socialist LBJ really was with his Great Society swindle. Today we suffer because of his entitlement society.

After that initial error, I voted for the Republican candidates. As I think back, I feel my best choice was Ronald Reagan. The Bush Boys seemed OK until both showed their “dynasty” colors in 2016. Neither Bush backed Donald Trump even though both knew about Clinton corruption! Then it came to Trump.

Donald Trump, like Ronald Reagan, is a political outsider. Trump is a businessman who’s done very well for himself and his employees. Trump got my vote. Therefore, if Trump had lost, I was supposed to run amuck and protest his loss. As we’ve seen, the reverse is true. Hillary Huggers just can’t believe she lost. Their first instinct is to do what the cover suggested back before the elections.

Sorry…The Week Magazine got it wrong! There should be a re-issue with pictures of Hillary Henchmen running crazy for Clinton! However, that magazine does lean to the LEFT of America…why expect a retraction!

Protesting the Vote of the Silent Majority

I don’t know about you folks, but I’ve had my fill of anti-Trump protesters! Where do these people come from? Did they vote in the presidential election? Is anyone paying them to act like thugs? Why don’t we just crack down on them and put them to work cleaning up the mess they’ve made?

These so-called protesters appear to have a problem with Donald Trump winning an election. Yet, they do NOT have a problem with the corruption found within the Obama White House, the Hillary Clinton campaign, and the Clinton Foundation! WikiLeaks gave us a plethora of information regarding the Obama-Clinton cartel. There’s not much more to read concerning these dubious politicians. Are these protesters so dishonest themselves that they are blind to all the corruption?

The Main Stream Media appeases these protesters by insulting Donald Trump. The major cable network talking heads and news print pencil pushers are still crying in their headlines of a Clinton victory. The media is hopelessly entrenched in their liberal illusion that they deliberately fail to understand or acknowledge the will of the Silent Majority. Donald Trump is our next President!

Many of these media rascals went to liberal schools and were taught by liberal pinheads that grew up in the anti-Vietnam 60s. I remember seeing college pukes protesting a war they were trying to avoid. Too many of my high school friends could not protest, because they were fighting the same war the college geeks were protesting! As it turns out, the students of the 60s became liberal teachers of the 90s and on. These “adults” influence the current batch of protesting spoiled brats.

Now back to our current state of insanity. I can’t say if these Trump protesters are genuine or whether they just follow a trend. Do we have a bunch of modern day Hanoi Jane Fondas or John Swift Boat Kerrys running amuck? Are some protesters paid by socialist like George Soros? Is the Clinton Foundation filtering money to transport these pseudo protesters to and from chosen sights? Are these activists act or passive? Can you tell me…what’s the deal pickle?

The Main Stream Media Just Won't Let Us Enjoy Our Victory

The Main Stream Media just won’t let go of its anti-Trump sentiments. A case in point is our local newspaper the San Antonio Express-News, part of the Hearst group. I was reading this Sunday’s paper. We get the Sunday paper only…mainly for coupons, the comic strips, the obits to see who kicked off, occasionally the sports section for horse racing news, and the Business section. Well, I dug into the Business section and found some interesting tidbits.

I found three headlines in the Business section that appear to be critical, as usual, of President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. The first one at the top of the business page reads “WILL TRUMP STEAL CHRISTMAS CHEER?” Boy if that doesn’t say it all! Of course, the writer, who I will keep nameless, adds a sub-headline that reads, “Some analysts fear surprise win could curtail spending.” The writer gives us a juicy headline and then falls back on unknown “analysts” and their fear of lower than expected Christmas spending. Could these analysts be the same intelligent losers who said Trump would never win? Are these financial gurus the same bunch who called Hillary Clinton a winner? Could it be that these same analysts were the ones giving Barack Obama such great advice on our economy? Heaven forbid these analysts don’t work for some circus sideshow!

The next headline touted “Is Facebook influencing or simply reflecting society?” Now the premise here is that some FB posts were fake headlines centering on Hillary Clinton’s detractors. The fakers mention premature deaths happening to FBI agents who snitched on Hillary. So is it FB news, gossip, or lies? I guess anyone reading these FB posts will automatically think EVERYTHING they read is true! So where are those mindless twits so I can sell them some swampland in Washington D.C.?

The third headline that caught my eye read, “Trump’s victory pleases investors – for now.” The writer wants you to be warned that maybe Donald Trump’s win will be good for our economy...and then maybe not! The person just can’t decide which way the pendulum swings since he had to pawn his crystal ball! I’ll take this article with a grain of sand since the writer is a New York Times hack! One last thing about this article, it was in the “Commentary” section…so its just one person’s opinion.

Well, that’s it for me…I’ve given you my two cents and don’t expect any change in return. It’s my OPINION that the media will keep hacking at Donald Trump because they were all wrong about the presidential election. We, the Silent Majority, selected substance over political scammers!