In today's
issue: Savage told his listeners he believes there's something behind the David
Petraeus scandal that no one is talking about.
"We
know the behavior is unacceptable," Savage said of the extramarital affair
that was revealed just days after President Obama was re-elected. "We know
that philandering is potential grounds for court martial."
"But
it didn't apply to Bill Clinton. Oh no. At that time, all of the vermin in the
media, who are such Obamaites today, called those shenanigans. Oh, look the
other way, it's the evil right wing trying to bring down a good man, Bill
Clinton. I don't hear that now.
"But
you don't understand the real reason Petraeus was taken down," Savage
said.
Savage
revealed his suspicion:
It's
somewhat to do with Benghazi and his testimony, for sure. They want to block
it, which makes no sense, incidentally, because he' still an American citizen,
he could still testify. I don't know where it says if you resign, even in
shame, you lose your right to speak. We don't live in Nazi Germany. He could
still speak. But there is something more to it that you don't know.
Do you want
to hear what it is? Are you ready for this?
Tell me who
is going to run for the Republican ticket in 2016 who has a scintilla of a
chance to win. Answer, nobody. Not one of these sacks of loserdom could ever
win. The bloated hippo from New Jersey (Gov. Chris Christie) finished. The
embrace of Obama finished the bloated hippo from New Jersey. Period. (Sen.
Marco) Rubio, a lightweight. Zero. There's nobody. I'll tell you there was only
one person. It was Petraeus.
Petraeus
was the only one the Republicans could have floated who would have had a chance
to defeat whoever the Democrats run in 2016. We love our generals. Especially,
real generals. As opposed to the fake ones there who in the Pentagon who do it
just for the benefits and the contracts.
Savage,
noting that as a novelist, he "thinks in novelistic ways," said he
suspects both parties got together and worked out a deal.
Here's the
screenplay. Here's the scene. ... The Republican Party leadership decided they
didn't want Petraeus as a candidate in 2016, because they couldn't control him,
because he's too honorable. The Democrats didn't want him to testify about the
Benghazi debacle, because it would have possibly brought Obama down.
... So the
Republicans said, 'We'll go along with your exposure of this affair, because we
both win.' That's it. This didn't happen from one side. Both sides wanted to
get rid of him.
Posted from Michael Savage's email newsletter.
